I dont know how many of you have seen this already. I just came across it today. I couldnt believe what I was hearing but by the end of the clip I thought it was a complete pisstake.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006370124,00.html
Surely?
If not, I feel sorry for those kids.
Britney Rant
-
eamon angelface
- Posts: 960
- Joined: 04 Aug 2006 22:06
Were you expecting anything else from uneducated southern trash?
I'm quite surprised she hasn't gotten caught saying something terribly racist. You know damn well in private her and her husband throw the n word around.
I'd like her see her and Paris Hilton in a spelling bee.
I'm quite surprised she hasn't gotten caught saying something terribly racist. You know damn well in private her and her husband throw the n word around.
I'd like her see her and Paris Hilton in a spelling bee.
DLT Prom Queen 4 years running.
This has to be real, unfortunately... It's not like Jessica Simpson's strategic idiocies to get publicity. This is just blatant stupidity and grossness in front of the candid camera.
It is a shame that a little girl had so little guidance in real life and became the blathering bag of mostly water that she is, but there's no two ways about it. Britney's dumb as toothpaste and she's breeding.
It is a shame that a little girl had so little guidance in real life and became the blathering bag of mostly water that she is, but there's no two ways about it. Britney's dumb as toothpaste and she's breeding.
gift wrote:I second that question.....who really cares about her now other than national enquirer and star magazine?MSD wrote:why are we even dicussing her rant...lol
The link I posted had been viewed about 2 million times on the source site before I linked it here.
So I guess about 2 million people other than national enquirer and star magazine cares.
The masses will always have a morbid curiosity with the private lives of famous people.
Untrue. The majority of people probably click to see 'what' you are referring to (or others who have posted the link). Once watched, they resume their 'who the fuck cares' attitude.gulliver wrote:gift wrote:I second that question.....who really cares about her now other than national enquirer and star magazine?MSD wrote:why are we even dicussing her rant...lol
The link I posted had been viewed about 2 million times on the source site before I linked it here.
So I guess about 2 million people other than national enquirer and star magazine cares.
The masses will always have a morbid curiosity with the private lives of famous people.
This is the same flawed logic the gaming and music industry use. "We've lost millions of sales to downloads!"
No you haven't, most people wouldn't bother to pay $2 for your pile of shit release, but for free, they'll check it out... and confirm what they thought, it sucks ass.
lolocaust.smash wrote:Untrue. The majority of people probably click to see 'what' you are referring to (or others who have posted the link). Once watched, they resume their 'who the fuck cares' attitude.gulliver wrote:gift wrote: I second that question.....who really cares about her now other than national enquirer and star magazine?
The link I posted had been viewed about 2 million times on the source site before I linked it here.
So I guess about 2 million people other than national enquirer and star magazine cares.
The masses will always have a morbid curiosity with the private lives of famous people.
This is the same flawed logic the gaming and music industry use. "We've lost millions of sales to downloads!"
No you haven't, most people wouldn't bother to pay $2 for your pile of shit release, but for free, they'll check it out... and confirm what they thought, it sucks ass.
There's really no arguing with logic like that.
Flawless victory.
Smash made the same point I did. He phrased his a lot better though.AngelBaby wrote:lolocaust.smash wrote:The majority of people probably click to see 'what' you are referring to (or others who have posted the link). Once watched, they resume their 'who the fuck cares' attitude.gulliver wrote:
The link I posted had been viewed about 2 million times on the source site before I linked it here.
So I guess about 2 million people other than national enquirer and star magazine cares.
The masses will always have a morbid curiosity with the private lives of famous people.
There's really no arguing with logic like that.
Flawless victory.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests